It's not there yet.
What To Look For In The Inspector Generals Report About DOJ And FBI Election Interference
some key points of interest.Will There Be Criminal Prosecutionand of Whom?
On the big picture, there will be two final take-aways of note from Horowitzs report: first, whether the IGs conclusions raise the possibility of criminal prosecution and, if so, of whom. The IG has already referred a criminal case against former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe to DCs U.S. attorneys office. That was based on Horowitzs findings that McCabe was responsible for leaks to the Wall Street Journal but lied about his role both to his former boss, FBI director James Comey, and to investigators.
While the IG report will not announce what criminal referrals, if any, have been made, the findings will provide insight, just as did the announcement that McCabe demonstrated a lack of candor in his conversations with Comey and investigators.
Second, Horowitzs report will indicate whether there will be calls for a fresh investigation of Hillary Clinton for her use of a private server and reckless handling of classified material while U.S. secretary of state. IG Horowitz is not investigating Clinton, but the OIGs focus on the FBI and DOJs handling of the Clinton investigation and report will likely reveal numerous deficiencies in the underlying probe. The deficiencies exposed will prompt calls for a new, unbiased, and thorough investigation of Clinton.
Democrats and the press will predictably push back, branding the demands a partisan ploy to take the focus off Special Counsel Robert Muellers investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. The details of the report will dictate which of these dueling narratives succeeds.
The rest of the article at the link, worth reading.
It’s there now. 568 pages.