Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No more asylum claims based on fear of gang violence: Sessions...
abcnews ^ | Jun 11, 2018, 4:44 PM ET | Luke Barr

Posted on 06/11/2018 2:07:14 PM PDT by caww

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is making an aggressive new move to crack down on illegal immigration, announcing Monday that the Trump administration will no longer accept asylum claims based on fear of domestic violence, gang violence or other “personal crime.”

“Our nation’s immigration laws provide for asylum to be granted to individuals who have been persecuted, or who have a well-founded fear of persecution, on account of their membership in a ‘particular social group,’ but most victims of personal crimes do not fit this definition — no matter how vile and reprehensible the crime perpetrated against them," a Justice Department statement said.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: agsessions; aliens; asylum; braking; jeffsessions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: miniTAX

Look.....from start to finish of Trumps run he spoke heavily about where he stood on illegal immigration. You don’t think those planning to do that didn’t up their game to get here ASAP before he shut them out? Of course they did and that’s certainly much to do with the numbers trying to cross. I expected there to be a rush...most did.

Further Trump and Sessions have clearly been working against sanctuary cities so your argument fails in that respect. As you know the mayors and Governors have filed numerous suites granted by crooked Judges.....so our guys press on another way. I’s a fight that is not going away tomorrow.

You should know that when we move against anything anything to enforce or change immigration the push back is going to be fierce and nasty....further we want things to ‘stick’ when they are caught and laws changed. So yes it’s going to take more than just the months given thus far.....even further when any of it has to pass congress to reform the laws.


61 posted on 06/13/2018 12:33:53 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I agree....


62 posted on 06/13/2018 12:36:50 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

The Dems always go for the emotional impact and it’s always about ‘the children’ and ‘women’......

Further those getting here don’t even closely resemble a’refugee’...nor that they’re starving.


63 posted on 06/13/2018 12:41:50 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
Maybe scapegoating Sessions is an indirect way of expressing bitter disappointment over the speed at which Trump is draining the swamp. If they make everything Jeff Sessions’ fault, they can judge Trump’s presidency a failure, yet still claim to be loyal Trump supporters.

That's as good an explanation as any. Some people thought that all Trump and his cabinet members would have to do is snap their fingers, and overnight all corrupt politicians would be in Federal prison and all illegal immigrants would be deported. On the latter at least, Sessions has been making steady progress not only at deporting some of the illegals that are here, but on keeping future ones (including those with fraudulent refugee claims) out. It's going slower than I would like to see, but it's still much better than anything we've seen on immigration for the past 20 or 30 years.

64 posted on 06/13/2018 6:34:39 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: caww

That looks like a mighty well fed bunch of “migrants”. I used to think that fleeing persecution caused weight loss.


65 posted on 06/13/2018 7:43:09 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Thank you for that wonderful illustration of liberal thinking and NO, it does NOT need a sarcasm tag, I’m still wiping the sarcasm off my monitor.


66 posted on 06/13/2018 7:46:19 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Caveat: All ‘just a cotton pickin’ minit’ posts are intrinsically over-the-top sarcastic parodies of leftardian thought. I do not use a sarc tab for them, because it would ruin the effect of the post.


67 posted on 06/13/2018 8:11:26 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Don’t you see? They had to resort to cannibalism. That’s why there are few women and children amongst them. They read Swift’s Modest Proposal, and the fatwa from Al Azhar permitting sex with one’s spouse immediately after death, and cannibalism thereafter.


68 posted on 06/13/2018 8:13:50 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson