Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Ummmm...King George III was NOT a spectacular monarch ( Queen Elizabeth I certainly was, though )and was pretty much a do nothing one in his later years. It was too early in Queen Victoria's reign to know how good or not she was and by the time she was Queen, she didn't have all that much "political" power.

As far as people are concerned, human nature doesn't change; only technology changes. And that's why, even though both Shakespeare and Gilbert wrote for their own eras, both writers are still valid/interesting today.

The wonderful thing about Gilbert's satire, is that he chose themes that have not only held up, throughout the ensuing century plus decades, but many have become relevant as people have come back to the same things again and again...transendentalism, aethetics,"feministism"/women in college, class warfare, do nothing pols, stupid laws, "the Peter Principle" stuff, etc. !

302 posted on 06/08/2018 1:59:18 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
Deference to the king/queen was a expected in G+S.

The song does not say which George, but it does feature the Battle of Waterloo, during which George III was king. However, I agree that he does not deserve credit for Wellington's victory. In fact, in his later years he suffered from dementia. See the movie The Madness of King George. Henry V was actually present at Agincourt, but later monarchs get too much credit for their military forces' triumphs.

306 posted on 06/08/2018 2:38:19 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson