Have you read the decision? Have you read the comments on this thread? Before SHOUTING, you might want to take a little time to understand what a narrow decision by the Supreme Court means. It has nothing to do with the number of Justices that agree with the decision. The statement is quite true, the decision was 7-2 and the opinion was decidedly narrow.
-
Yes... and as I said elsewhere, that doesn’t excuse the media. The majority of people are going to see the “narrow victory” headline and assume that the voting was narrow. The media is purposely misleading people by using that word.
It's much more than that. The is actually a fairly new and broad case in respect to the narrow issue presented. The media wants to make people that the holding is much narrower than it is. It's actually a major advance in "free exercise" jurisprudence.