The following statement by the majority makes it clear that this wasn’t a solid win for Christians- it states that the state ‘could have presented their side without bias’ and intimated that the state could have probably prevailed-
“The inference here is thus that Phillips’ religious objection was not considered with the neutrality required by the Free Exercise Clause. The State’s interest could have been weighed against Phillips’ sincere religious objections in a way consistent with the requisite religious neutrality that must be strictly observed.”
That makes it sound like Phillips very well could have lost had the state just not been poopie heads about their position and bias-
like you said- this aint over by a long shot- but it doesn’t look good for future cases- not impossible, but not as strong as we’d like unfortunately
This might be all moot however, because there’s no way these folks can do it EXCEPT by being poopie heads. That’s the nature of the “gay” beast.