Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson

[[You are free, within your license to sell what you want;]]

You say you are free to sell whatever you wish- meaning that if i don’t wish to sell that i don’t normally offer, I don’t have to- then go on to claim i can not refuse to provide something that is demanded of me that i do not normally offer because of religious beliefs? IF a store doesn’t wish to offer cakes celebrating homosexual marriages, then they should be able to do that every bit as much as the store that doesn’t wish to sell Satanic or pedophilia or bestiality material in their bookstore- You said it yourself that a store has the right to sell what it wishes, so in reality, no, my scenario wasn’t inapposite (and yes i had to look the word up lol)

The SC ruled today that the baker’s religious rights were violated- that it was he who was discriminate against because of a bias against religion

From what I understand Cases during the same period were brought before the courts where people demanded ‘anti-homosexual messages’ on their cakes- and the store refused to make them and the courts did nothing to prevent the store from making that decision


196 posted on 06/04/2018 8:18:32 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

Wring, Stop putting words in the Court’s mouth. They ruled that the commissions blatant bias against religion denied him the religious neutrality necessary for a fair hearing.


200 posted on 06/04/2018 8:54:41 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson