Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manc
Correct me if i am wrong but this now helps the baker in Oregon, and other businesses which were told they had to ignore their religious beliefs?

Should, but probably won’t. This opinion was deliberately crafted so narrowly that it likely only affects Phillips. At least, other leftist courts will say so, especially in Oregon.

193 posted on 06/04/2018 5:56:04 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

[[Should, but probably won’t. This opinion was deliberately crafted so narrowly that it likely only affects Phillips.]]

I think it might affect any business that was fined before the gay marriage ‘law’ went into effect, and any business that a town or county or whatever court rules in a biased manner against the religion- which is what happened in this case- The judges in the lower court were actually hostile towards the man’s religious beliefs- The SC basically reprimanded them for doing so- and has opened the door for the baker to take action against that lower court or township


198 posted on 06/04/2018 8:34:43 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson