“It means there’s basically an ability to boycott gay marriages”, as if that’s a bad thing. Shouldn’t free people be able to boycott whatever they like, without government forcing them to buy something they don’t want, or do something they don’t want to do?
The liberal judges are trying to find a way to curtail free speech without admitting that’s what they’re doing.. If they give Phillips a pass ,then everyone involved with weddings can turn gays down...Liberals are trying to figure a way to stop it ..They hate free speech for anyone but them...
It should do no such thing as boycotting gay marriages, that's an asinine argument. Would gays still be able to be married? Of course they would! Instead of the queers and their panderers starting their own businesses catering to their desires they demand that others........especially Christians celebrate their perversity.
The left can not ever leave anyone alone
Goahbi hate all those people
I find it interesting that he framed it as a free speech issue. I’ve always seen it as a free exercise of religion issue.