true...
i would only suggest...
1/ we’ve seen legal investigations that set up their victims with totally fabricated and falsified ‘evidence’ and judges who go ahead and both issue patently unjustified orders, warrants, etc. A ‘legal’ proceeding is SUPPOSED to provide due process of law.. but it all depends on the prosector and judge...........and sometimes....the innocent get victimized badly.
so... I would have the SAME concerns for a ‘legal’ investigation as I do for this one
2. a “political” investigation (and subsequent removal from office) lacks the SUPPOSED protections of a “legal” proceeding (the procedures are up to Congress and the constitutional removal standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors” is just one more of the constitutional phrases/provisions that a politicized, super-leftist Congress could, would just run rampant over, run right past it... at their pleasure... just like when Congress ignored its duty regarding the ineligible illegal immigrant’s taking office in 2009)
I appreciate your POV but I remain of the opinion that the best available course will be for DJT to flush this entire socalled “investiation” right down the nearest toilet.
Now. (DLT is famously good at communicating his thoughts with the American people, he can handle the commie-press squwaks better this way than later when they all gang up on his impeachment... it will be noisy both ways but THIS way he won’t be standing trial)
You make some good points. My belief is any actions taken by Trump will happen after NK Summit is resolved and more likely to go your suggested way if negotiations are successful.
Politics is really not so much about what is right or wrong as you know.