It's the timing of the question in the report. The media can't wait to poke holes in a pro-armed citizen story so this is the first question they have, investigate the hero. I think I could wait until the police announce their summary as it's their prerogative.
Maybe. What if it was a pro-2nd Amendment organization like Breitbart who knew the OK laws and knew that in all likelihood everything was legal.
You don't think it helps the "good guy with a gun" narrative to have the police state that it was, indeed, a good guy?
I'm in favor of as many facts as we can get.