“claiming without evidence”
This is an odd phrase, but I’ve heard it multiple times when a media outlet has a “pro” Trump tidbit. It is a Main Stream Media indicator that they have colluded in how to report a story in the most negative way. He was a walkin, he was an informant...all the other nonsense. Was he an undercover paid provacateur from the FBI? Did he actively come with an agenda from the FBI? Was he paid by the FBI? Did this violate the Hatch Act (at the very least)? Did they hide this and try to do parallel construction to make the case? Does Mueller know about any of this either before during or after? Does he have to recuse himself? If he has not started to investigate this aspect, is he in violation and involved in malicious prosecution?
DK
“There’s insufficient evidence. We don’t need an investigation.”