They really are worried about the protecting the "source" I wonder why...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: mandaladon
Their sense of right and wrong is seriously warped.
25 posted on
05/19/2018 3:58:44 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Formerly SandyInSeattle cuz I moved!)
To: mandaladon
26 posted on
05/19/2018 3:59:32 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(If Illegals Voted Republican 66 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall !")
To: mandaladon
Chuck Schumer belongs in prison, too.
He sounds a little worried they’re getting too close to the criminal enterprise known as the DNC.
27 posted on
05/19/2018 3:59:55 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: mandaladon
Wait a minute. Are they now claiming the executive branch secretly inserting spies into the opposition party’s presidential campaign crosses no legal lines? What was all the Watergate hubbub about then?
29 posted on
05/19/2018 4:00:44 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: mandaladon
All Trump has to say is “You know there was something about......I never really trusted him.” Mueller’s investigation would then collapse.
30 posted on
05/19/2018 4:00:48 PM PDT by
allendale
(.)
To: mandaladon
Chuckles the Clown should be raising hell with the NYT and Washington Compost for printing and the DOJ/FBI for leaking the info that outed Stefan Halper!
But that is not his motive. He is attempting to divert the attention from the Seditious Bastards.
31 posted on
05/19/2018 4:01:02 PM PDT by
VRWCarea51
(The Original 1998 Version)
To: mandaladon
The dems are pretty worried about this becoming public. Must be big.
32 posted on
05/19/2018 4:01:47 PM PDT by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: mandaladon
Schumer, you idiot, it is the DOJ that is crossing the line
by leaking the details.
Go talk to your boy Jeff.
33 posted on
05/19/2018 4:02:01 PM PDT by
odawg
To: mandaladon
So, if the Trump Administration identifies the spy, the Dems will charge Trump with obstruction of justice.
34 posted on
05/19/2018 4:02:56 PM PDT by
Yulee
To: mandaladon
The “Source” participated in criminal activity.
He is now fair game.
Fair game for a Grand Jury.
Fair game for an indictment.
Fair game for a prison sentence or hanging.
35 posted on
05/19/2018 4:03:10 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
To: mandaladon
Getting over target always brings out the most flak.
36 posted on
05/19/2018 4:03:39 PM PDT by
ImaGraftedBranch
(The love of many has grown cold. Come, Lord Jesus.)
To: mandaladon
Nunes could start threatening obstruction charges for those preventing Congress from performing oversight
37 posted on
05/19/2018 4:04:03 PM PDT by
Principled
(No one will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed.)
To: mandaladon
Fresh off of defending MS-13, Senator Schumer is defending a coup against the President.
You can smell the flop sweat.
Schumer and Warner sound more like co-conspirators than public officials defending the Constitution.
38 posted on
05/19/2018 4:04:08 PM PDT by
joshua c
(To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives)
To: mandaladon
They are trying to create another Plame Gate.
To: mandaladon
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Saturday said Republican lawmakers efforts to uncover the identity of an FBI informant in order to obstruct special counsel Robert Muellers investigation comes close to "crossing a legal line."Eeeeeeeeeexcellent! As long as it doesn't actually cross the line it's all good. Carry on with the uncovering.
Or should we call in Susan Rice to help pull the mask off the informant?
40 posted on
05/19/2018 4:04:36 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: mandaladon
Chuckie’s threats clearly constitute obstruction of justice. Lock him up!
41 posted on
05/19/2018 4:06:13 PM PDT by
KyCats
To: mandaladon
the commies leftist D party bosses are getting worried they’ll be uncovered, exposed, prosecuted...
42 posted on
05/19/2018 4:06:49 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
To: mandaladon
Exposing sources makes it that much harder for every part of the intelligence community to gather intelligence on those who wish to do us harm, Warner wrote. Hmmm. I wonder which "us" it is that Warner's referring to, eh? Let's play pronoun bingo...
Exposing sources makes it that much harder for every part of the intelligence community to gather intelligence on those who wish to do Democrats harm, Warner wrote.
Eh?
43 posted on
05/19/2018 4:06:51 PM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Marxism: Wonderful theory, wrong species)
To: mandaladon
"It would be at best irresponsible, and at worst potentially illegal, for members of Congress to use their positions to learn the identity of an FBI source for the purpose of undermining the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in our election."Actually, Warner is correct... but as an attorney, he should also know that the reason for bringing a certain evidentiary fact is crucial. Since the purpose of looking into the source is NOT "undermining the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in our election, but rather to find out whether the investigation itself was illegal, it magically changes from "irresponsible and potentially illegal" to fully justified and proper.
(eg: it is improper to bring up prior illegal acts as proof that a defendant committed the crime being charged, but it is usually allowed as proof of character, when that aspect of character is raised)
Rule 404: "This evidence may be admissible for another purpose, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident."
44 posted on
05/19/2018 4:07:19 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: mandaladon
Crossing the line describes the sitting party using the immense powers of government to undermine the opposing party’s election campaign.
THAT was crossing the line.
45 posted on
05/19/2018 4:08:00 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson