Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
Skin pigmentation is not a race.

Actually, skin pigmentation can be one of the criteria that determines to which race a person is considered to belong. My general biology students are always surprised to learn that race is a term that has no biological basis. It is a term that is best described in a study of sociology rather than biology. Biologically speaking, all of us are members of the "human" race and are members of the same biological species, Homo sapiens. The biological definition of a species is very simple and very specific. Members of a species can produce viable offspring which can in turn produce viable offspring. The definition of race is not nearly so simple and specific!

68 posted on 05/19/2018 5:03:07 PM PDT by srmorton (Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death,....therefore, choose life..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: srmorton

My take is that these days the PC definition of race has been reduced to skin color.

Even worse is the lack of any pretense of nuance. There are but two bins; White and of Color. But there is no objective measure to tell where the border of the bins lie so there is really no way to argue with those making the assignments of people into bins.


74 posted on 05/19/2018 5:18:43 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson