Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk Needs to Dial Down on His Galactic Ambitions
Townhall.com ^ | May 19, 2018 | Nicholas Waddy

Posted on 05/19/2018 7:47:13 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: PreciousLiberty

There will be an ever increasing demand for bandwidth, as people get more of their video entertainment from the internet. The satellites will also deliver global phone service.


21 posted on 05/19/2018 8:18:49 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There are, simply put, simpler and cheaper ways to bridge the digital divide.

...

No there aren’t. SpaceX will have an incredible cost advantage. They’ll be making everything from the launchers, to the satellites, to the ground stations.


22 posted on 05/19/2018 8:19:07 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Every one of these accidents have found the driver to be at fault. The teenagers were going over 100 mph on a curvy road with a 25 mph speed limit.

If they are driven the way they are supposed to be driven they are probably safer than a gas car. The first government investigation found Tesla cars equipped with autopilot had 40% fewer accidents.


23 posted on 05/19/2018 8:22:40 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Satellite Internet sucks due to latency. Nobody who has a reasonable alternative would ever use it. (I do realize there are many folks who do not have a reasonable alternative.)


24 posted on 05/19/2018 8:26:05 AM PDT by KevinB (I do not care for this Obama fellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Musk needs the Global Warming scam to be real, leading to gov. intervention against fossil fuels, and preys on those that believe the Global Warming scam is real.


25 posted on 05/19/2018 8:39:22 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

in that case, guess i’ll have to rush out and git me one of those luxury golf carts.


26 posted on 05/19/2018 8:44:14 AM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why?

Those that live under rocks don’t count and should stay quiet


27 posted on 05/19/2018 8:46:47 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

“My first thought when seeing those twin rocket boosters landing at Cape Canaveral a few months back.”

almost as amazing to me is that the SuperDraco rocket engine combustion chamber is manufactured with 3D printing ...


28 posted on 05/19/2018 8:47:31 AM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

Yes, IF you are linked to a geosynchronous satellite. Those are a LONG ways up.

If you can communicate through a swarm of close-in low earth orbit satellites, the latency is unnoticeable.


29 posted on 05/19/2018 9:16:26 AM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by "climate change" in urban customers' attitudes (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Writer is a pompous douche with a jealousy complex.


30 posted on 05/19/2018 9:19:14 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nikola Tesla >> Thomas Edison


31 posted on 05/19/2018 9:23:00 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

“It’s amazing what taxpayer money can accomplish!”

YEA!!!! Just ask Lockheed Martin!
Ask Raytheon!!!
Ask Boeing!!!
admit it....you anti Musk people are just JEALOUS....how very lefist of you.


32 posted on 05/19/2018 9:24:32 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Geosynchronous are, I believe, 23,000 miles up.


33 posted on 05/19/2018 9:28:17 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: proust

Yea something like that has never in the past hundred years happened to a combustion powered vehicle.

get over your jealousy..


34 posted on 05/19/2018 9:29:51 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

You point would be better taken without the all caps and quadruple exclamation points.
Jealousy is an emotion with no political persuasion.


35 posted on 05/19/2018 9:30:39 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Ok, thanks for the advice


36 posted on 05/19/2018 9:34:05 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

May the Force (of the Federal Government) be with you!


37 posted on 05/19/2018 9:39:50 AM PDT by mikrofon (Weekend BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
As opposed to roughly 100 miles up for low earth orbit.

About a quarter second round trip for a signal to geosynchronous.

That's about 50 times slower than for LEO, assuming the slant distance to the LEO satellite is 500 miles, since it's unlikely it would be directly overhead.

38 posted on 05/19/2018 9:57:05 AM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by "climate change" in urban customers' attitudes (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Why would they single out StarLink Internet? Musk is number four to petition, and so far the only American company to obtain approval for an internet constellation of satellites. His competitors sought to block the new arrival gaining the required operating license, through manipulating the FCC and other bureaucratic routes. As is, NASA managed to slip in a mandate of an accelerated deployment and deorbit scheme applicable specifically to SpaceX satellites, so as to increase risks of a fumble.

There are more than a half dozen competitors evaluating this opportunity. When a pack of companies compete for the same target, there is a sound business basis for that move. In the StarLink plan, seventy percent of revenue comes from back-haul and other services, rather than providing direct internet access to subscribers. One third or fewer satellite node hops can manage a link, relative to several dozen fiber node hops around the planet.

As for the threat to complacent internet providers, my ISP sees the writing on the wall, and recently moved to lower rates/deliver more service, as to lock in their customer base before the new competition arrives.


39 posted on 05/19/2018 10:05:41 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
SpaceX has put 82 satellites in orbit so far, and only 4 of these were US federal gov't contracts. In addition, SpaceX has sent 13 re-supply missions to the ISS, and is the only provider of such services to allow for thousands of pounds of material to be returned intact from ISS. Whatever taxpayer money SpaceX has received, it has earned by providing tremendous value.

I agree that the economic viability of the Starlink project must be assessed and re-assessed before billions of dollars are spent on it, but critics should not ignore the fundamental advances made by SpaceX, which have resulted in plans for reusable boosters and space planes from other launch providers around the world, which will certainly kick the space race and colonization efforts into a much higher gear.

40 posted on 05/19/2018 10:06:06 AM PDT by BushMeister ("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson