So..are they saying the New York Times is “fake news”??
It’s crazy. I literally thought that it must be a repost of an article from last year, just to show how wrong they were in retrospect. But no, it’s from today!
They are trying to claim that if the informant wasn’t employed by the FBI before joining the campaign then the informant cannot be a mole. They aren’t denying that there’s an informant, they are just playing word games about his motivation and the timing.