IG Horowitz... “Reasonable Grounds” FBI Violated FEDERAL LAW in Bureau’s Handling of Hillary...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | May 17 2018 | Cristina Laila

[Alberta's Child]

Nope. LOL.

LS is Larry Schweikart. He's an author and historian who has some connections inside the political world.

Larry Schweikart

[Alberta's Child]

Can you post that timeline? I haven’t seen any public report indicating when “that change” took place.

[Alberta's Child]

Understood — thanks for clarifying that.

[iontheball]

Trump is pulling a massive psyops campaign on hundreds of millions of people, using existing media infrastructure to deliver the message. If he can successfully defeat the deep state and restore the republic, then the books that will be written about this guy, the science of what he was able to accomplish, will dominate academics and historians for generations.
___________________________________________
Terrific observations. If mental gymnastics were an Olympic sport, Trump would win the gold medal, hands down. His competitors are diminished to useful idiots, low life losers and whiners who sense they can never match his skill set.

[tennmountainman]

Funny. Your style of writing is a lot like his.
Even a lot of the same words, unusual words.
I once was on his email list, until I disagreed with
him about Mueller being on Trump’s team.
Your style reminds me of his style, from the numerous
ping emails I once received.

As far as a time line, I speculate that when Mueller decided
to squeeze him. But we do know the original FBI agents
did not believe he was lying. That we know as a fact.

[Fantasywriter]

Here is a short, brilliant and d@mning article on why some are indicted for perjury while Clapper was allowed to skate. [Note: the part I omitted was as excellent as what I posted; immanently worthwhile to read the entire, brief analysis]:

‘WHY NO PERJURY INDICTMENT FOR CLAPPER?

by Jacob G. Hornberger
June 13, 2013

The feds indicted and prosecuted Martha Stewart for lying to federal investigators about a stock trade. They also indicted baseball star Roger Clemens for supposedly lying to Congress about drug abuse.

So, the obvious question arises: Why no perjury indictment against Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, Jr.

Consider the following testimony that Clapper gave to Congress last March:

Senator Ron Wyden: Does the N.S.A. collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?

Clapper: No, sir. Not wittingly.

In light of the revelations regarding the super-secret NSA surveillance scheme on the American people, which is no longer super-secret, what other conclusion can be drawn than that Clapper knowingly, deliberately, and intentionally lied to Congress?’

snip

I’ll tell you why they’re not indicting James R. Clapper, Jr. It’s because he is a high official in what has effectively become the national-security branch of the U.S. government, a branch that consists of the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA. For all practical purposes, officials in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches aren’t about to enforce their perjury laws against what they know has grown into the most powerful of the four branches of the federal government.’

https://www.fff.org/2013/06/13/why-no-perjury-indictment-for-clapper/

[GOPJ]

Reasonable grounds means the matter now should clearly be prosecuted.

You're right Lent - it's the wrong time to give out passes to Washington 'elites'... Yes, prosecute the case... allow the law to do it's magic and heal the country.

[Lagmeister]

How quaint of you to ask. I will be 68 in August: grew up in a police family. I raised two sons: both graduated from the Virginia Military Institute and have outstanding careers.

I have a bachelor's degree (when it meant something) and spent 34 years in the corporate world - facing monthly, quarterly and yearly volume/profit numbers - retired now five years.

The last two books I started to read I put down because the villain was a predictable religious, white, male right-winger. I am now rereading 'The Original, Illustrated Sherlock Holmes' collection.

I voted Reagan twice and was one of the few early supporters of Trump in this forum.

I hope this helps.

[Jane Long]

What an asinine thing to ask or post.

How old are you? Are you in junior high computer lab class?

Geez.

[rxsid]

"referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution. "

There are a lot of out's there, to do nothing.

Hey...we investigated this for a long time, but in the end we felt we couldn't do anything about it.

[semantic]

To clarify my earlier point about an (over) abundance of targets, Trump has his pick among dozens of deep state conspirators who could be raided and frog marched today. This includes Rice, Powers, Brennan, Comey, et al. So, sure it would be satisfying to Trump's base to demonstrate his ability to flex some police muscle and humiliate the traitors as they did to Flynn and other patriots.

But, at the end of the day, what does that really get you? Does it put you on a path to be in league with Washington & Lincoln? Will Trump be referenced and studied for generations on just those accomplishments? No, the objective here is no different than that of the two referenced titans: the literal savior of the republic. That requires big game mode with high level strategic thinking.

So, how do you do it? Yeah, he could literally send in the Marines today, and with 50% support of the country, strong-arm the collapse of the deep state. Or, he can conduct a large scale pyscho-drama that provides a gateway for 60%+ of the American people to fully comprehend what occurred, what was attempted, and allow them to reach their **own** conclusions as to justice.

Mark my words, the objective is for treason to be as calmly understood & discussed as to what to have for dinner. When it's no longer a shock or surprise, then the resolve to deal with the attempted theft **of our country** (jeez, what would they have had in store for us?) will become mechanical. Take the emotion out, take out all possible explanations and defense, and you have an electorate abandoning the enemy.

[Fantasywriter]

OT. As a huge, massive Holmes/Conan-Doyle fan, I offer a suggestion in a similar genre. Namely, The Middle Temple Murder. Here is an excerpt from an Amazon review:

‘I rate this novel 5 stars. I rate it primarily on originality, plot and pacing, and the ability to mask the identity of the culprit to the very end. This may be one of the most original crime novels ever written. I’m of the opinion that this may be the first ever “Procedural” type of crime story. Where the story is revealed bit by bit as the facts become available, and in a logical sequence that doesn’t stretch the reader’s credulity, while at the same time taking numerous twists and turns along the way. Anyone familiar with the style of CSI or Law and Order would easily recognize the way the story is built up. And the surprise ending? A surprise! What else could it be. You won’t be able to figure out who the murderer is until the very end.’

Here is the link to read the novel free online:

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10373

[Lagmeister]

Thank you. Will look into it.

[Lopeover]

Thanks for your ping! This is a great observation!

[a little elbow grease]

As I said to others ................this post belongs to "semantic".;

He/she is the brilliant one.

[a little elbow grease]

"How old are you? Are you in junior high computer lab class?

Geez"

___________________________

Darn, I thought you had a brain in your head. You and I communicated many times here on FR.

WHAT in the world is wrong with asking politely of someone's age?

Get real...... or go over the D.U.

**********

[a little elbow grease]

"What an asinine thing to ask or post.

How old are you? Are you in junior high computer lab class?

Geez.

_________________

..... and I thought you were intelligent here, Janie.

Save your "asinine" remarks for others, please.

[a little elbow grease]

"Mark my words, the objective is for treason to be as calmly understood & discussed as to what to have for dinner. When it's no longer a shock or surprise, then the resolve to deal with the attempted theft **of our country** (jeez, what would they have had in store for us?) will become mechanical. Take the emotion out, take out all possible explanations and defense, and you have an electorate abandoning the enemy."

_______________

You are the greatest.

[Lopeover]

You put it out to us! Thanks!

[a little elbow grease]

Hey girlie................ are you a screwball lefty, or what in the heck is wrong with asking about someone's age?

Get a grip. Asking about someone's age is not mean or nasty ................it's just a question and a frame of reference.

GROW UP!!!!!