Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric

Please read this link from my post>

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/missing-files-motivated-the-leak-of-michael-cohens-financial-records


19 posted on 05/16/2018 10:10:14 PM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil

Will do.


22 posted on 05/16/2018 10:15:27 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Fossil

Typically, law enforcement databases have a complete audit trail, that will lead back to whoever the leaker is. They know time and date or the period over which he was poking around, and they’d know who did any searches for that particular individual’s records.

The proper action upon discovering info missing is to notify up the chain of command, not to download documents and hand them out to the press, so the excuse for releasing the other document doesn’t hold water. There’s one reason that’s a possibility for not following protocol, though. If the party who discovered the documents missing was making an unauthorized search, he/she would be admitting a potential firing offense by reporting it. If we discover the party handing out the document was a lawyer who refuses to identify the client who gave it to him, we can be pretty sure of that.


57 posted on 05/17/2018 12:46:54 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (So Long Obie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson