Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
If Obama really wanted to protect his signature foreign policy achievement, he should have had the Senate properly ratify it as a treaty so Trump couldn’t pull out of it like he just did.

He would have, if he could have. There were too many secret side-deals. He never could have gotten the two-thirds vote necessary out of the Senate.

25 posted on 05/08/2018 1:15:13 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine
That's the point -- he couldn't.

Obama had previously rationalized taking unilateral executive action by calling saying that if Congress failed to act, he would act. Pundits pointed out that Congress "failing" to act is itself an act; it is essentially a pocket veto of the Congressional kind, but it is not permission for the President to thumb his nose at them and act anyway.

Obama showed the same tendency when he declared that Congress's recess was not a "real" recess when he recess-appointed members to the National Labor Relations Board. SCOTUS had to rule that Congress, and not the President, gets to declare what is and is not a recess, and they invalidated Obama's appointments.

-PJ

-PJ

26 posted on 05/08/2018 1:21:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson