[AnthonySoprano]

-

Rod Rosenstein said this today:

“The way we operate in the Department of Justice, if we are going to accuse someone of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence, and credible witnesses, we need to be prepared to prove our case in court. And we have to fix our signature to the charging document, and that is something that not everybody appreciates,” Rosenstein told the audience.”

How does the Dossier fit that Evidence?

I say make old Rosenstein Exhibit #1.

He was bragging on his Dept, and this should come back to bite him.

-

[MAGAthon]

instead of heads rolling at NYT and at the rest of the FakeNewsMSM exposed in the Podesta emails, they clearly believe staying on the offensive is the equivalent of a Hillary win.

as for Mueller and co, what a pity Trump voters don’t protest en masse outside his office, demanding he and his team of Dem Donors resign now and get out of the way.

all the coup plotters need to be prosecuted.

[Freee-dame]

“The way we operate in the Department of Justice, if we are going to accuse someone of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence, and credible witnesses, we need to be prepared to prove our case in court. And we have to fix our signature to the charging document, and that is something that not everybody appreciates,” Rosenstein told the audience.”

Justice for me but not for thee???? Does he hear what he just said?

[mass55th]

Who is he kidding? He did the exact opposite when he signed at least one of the FISA warrant applications using an unverified fake dossier. If he’s done this with a warrant application, what other legal documents has he signed without admissible evidence and credible witnesses? Come on Rod...signing the FISA warrant can’t be the first time you violated the law.