Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kjam22
Based on federal law, sexual orientation is not protected. But courts have made it a protected class as if it were written into the civil rights acts with other protected classes.

The highly-publicized gay wedding cake cases all were decided in state courts, in states which had civil rights laws making sexual orientation a protected class.

74 posted on 04/25/2018 3:00:27 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
The highly-publicized gay wedding cake cases all were decided in state courts, in states which had civil rights laws making sexual orientation a protected class.

True. And that lobby is obviously hoping this spreads and becomes "law of the land." Here is an interesting read about sexual orientation not being "law" and the supreme court so far refusing to rule on it as a protected class. With split lower courts, it is expected the SC will eventually take it up. Hopefully, the court will find that if the will of the people is such, law will be enacted adding it to the civil rights amendment, rather than the court deciding the issue. (wishful thinking I know) Most of us in a corporate environment know that business has adopted it as policy just to stay out of trouble. Here's the link to the article...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/12/11/supreme-court-wont-hear-lgbt-job-discrimination-case/940028001/

80 posted on 04/25/2018 3:05:32 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson