Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge orders complete restart of DACA
Washington Times ^ | 4/24/18 | S Dinan

Posted on 04/24/2018 6:33:42 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper

Deepest blow yet to Trump’s phaseout

....Judge John D. Bates’s ruling would require a full restart, meaning even illegal immigrant “Dreamers” who’d never been approved before would now be able to apply for DACA.... judge imposed a 90-day delay on his own ruling to give the government a chance to reargue its case, but for now the ruling stands as the most severe blow yet to Mr. Trump’s phaseout.

Judge Bates said the government’s reasoning for revoking DACA wasn’t convincing enough, and so it amounted to an “arbitrary and capricious” decision, which makes it illegal under the Administrative Procedures Act.

“The Department’s decision to rescind DACA was predicated primarily on its legal judgment that the program was unlawful.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; daca; dacarestart; federalist78; fedjudgepresident; illegals; immigration; johnbates; johndbates; judge; judgebates; judges; judiciary; lawsuit; obama; overreaching; ruling; separation; trump; trumpillegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: butlerweave

Natch.


41 posted on 04/24/2018 6:50:13 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

So another NWO globalist open-borders Bush league Ripon Republican?


42 posted on 04/24/2018 6:50:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Is Judge Bates a Catholic?


43 posted on 04/24/2018 6:50:42 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“...which makes it illegal under the Administrative Procedures Act.”

How fooking retarded are you that can’t argue the EO is unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable.

I would ignore the court ...


44 posted on 04/24/2018 6:51:30 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Wasn’t the original DACA an Executive Order?? And can’t an EO be deleted by the next president?? And if not, why not??


45 posted on 04/24/2018 6:51:55 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The jurisdiction of district judges is completely in the hands of Congress. It is not a Constitutional provision. Congress needs to limit the authority of federal judges to issue orders that only affect their own judicial district.

It is insane that some big political contributors wife appointed by a past President can control the Country’s future. Insane.


46 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:13 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
a federal judge orders an illegal program started illegally with no basis in law by an illegitimate President to be restarted illegally.

The horror is that there are millions who think this is perfectly fine. I cannot even imagine what is facing this country in the foreseeable future.

47 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:15 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"so it amounted to an "arbitrary and capricious" decision, which makes it illegal under the Administrative Procedures Act. "

And Obama's initial DACA order WAS legal?

Make me LAUGH, judge, you F**KING IDIOT.

48 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:16 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

When did Judges become the POTUS?


49 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:21 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

The court has no standing to review a non-law.


50 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:49 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

As long as the Executive Branch continues to bow down to these rogue black-robed self-imposed dictators, the tyranny will continue.


51 posted on 04/24/2018 6:52:54 PM PDT by Kalamata (Meat hooks for Tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is why no deal was done with DACA the Rats the rinos didn’t have to because the Judiciary took away Trump’s leverage. Now this putz is saying a law previously ruled unconstitutional is now codified law. At some point Trump is going to have to go Andrew Jackson or everything he tries to do will be blocked by some hack Judge.


52 posted on 04/24/2018 6:53:07 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Do not give any funds and choke it to death...


53 posted on 04/24/2018 6:53:13 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Ignore, ignore, ignore.
The stupid azz made the ruling now enforce it.
Where’s his battalions? His army? He has NONE....toothless and utterly useless.
IGNORE this insane POS.


54 posted on 04/24/2018 6:53:45 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Ignore this ignoramus.


55 posted on 04/24/2018 6:54:00 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

No standing


56 posted on 04/24/2018 6:54:51 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

My question is this: Who does the Department of Justice send to argue these cases? Mickey Mouse? If Sessions oversees the presence of lawyers representing the USA before these loon judges it appears he is doing one lousy job.


57 posted on 04/24/2018 6:55:31 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m all outraged out...


58 posted on 04/24/2018 6:58:39 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Jeff Sessions IS the insurance policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

No surprise. I said in 2016 the nation will never recover from 0bama. So this to be expected. The nation remains in full scale collapse. Just watch, In due time, every Mexican will be given full citizenship.


59 posted on 04/24/2018 6:58:42 PM PDT by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I miss the rule of law.


60 posted on 04/24/2018 6:58:55 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson