You have a very short grasp of reason, and of American history. None of my posts have advocated for no government. Only you have brought that up. All of my posts have advocated the general position of our founders: less government is inherent for individual liberty. It is none of your business to control what others eat or consume. It is none of your business to require what others need (that’s “need” from your perspective) to know about what they eat or consume. Americans do fine when allowed the freedom of choice, which includes the freedom of what to learn about their choices.
Tyranny is usually served up in small bites. A little here, a little there, and the next thing you know, your freedom has been reduced. It is difficult to regain any portion of freedom lost
You said “When it comes to government, less is better, on all levels.”
So if a government had 10 regulations, 1 is less and must be better. And if a government has `1 regulation, 0 is less and must be better.
You’ve called for no government at all.
And once you agree with me that some government is necessary and good, then we’re just arguing about where to draw the line.