Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

I wonder does this entail, or lead to, a federal standard for training and qualification?
Not saying that would be a bad thing, or good.


No requirement for a federal standard.

It leads toward national Constitutional carry.

Anyone who can legally carry concealed in their home state can carry in any state in the Union, under that state’s concealed carry laws.

There are 12 states that do not require a permit to carry concealed now.

In 2004, there was one.


69 posted on 04/22/2018 9:07:30 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Lots of times we find there are “unintended consequences” to laws (I usually believe them to be intended myself).

Was wondering if Socialists could pass a national reciprocity law that superseded state laws, and resulted in tighter rules.
But I don’t believe they could negate state laws.


70 posted on 04/22/2018 9:17:30 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson