Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2018 5:27:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Man, if only we could elect republicans to hold the con-gre$$, we’d show ‘em who’s boss!


2 posted on 04/21/2018 5:39:25 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Apparently I voted demoncrat for 40 years. They all wore 'R' jerseys! 'R'atpublicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The issue with attorney client privilege is ATTORNEYS.
Judges are attorneys. They pretzel the law to their political (financial) benefit.
They mock the law and create distrust.
This won’t go on much longer.


4 posted on 04/21/2018 5:46:52 AM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hillary Clinton’s attorneys got immunity, Trumps get raided. This is a travesty!


5 posted on 04/21/2018 5:49:02 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There’s a fraud exception to this which is apparently what they used to justify it.


6 posted on 04/21/2018 5:51:25 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

L8r


7 posted on 04/21/2018 5:56:13 AM PDT by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I am at a loss as to why Judge Wood even allowed the Media lawyer to make any argument at all. As soon as he identified his clients, it was clear he was not a party to the case before her. He had no business even being in the court room.

* She allowed a party with no standing to make an argument in a criminal case.

Even worse, the argument was to breach the Attorney-Client privilege for no purpose other than to help the news media and embarrass a private citizen who was no party to the criminal proceeding.


10 posted on 04/21/2018 6:33:43 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Lookout journalists, you’re next. The privilege assumption for any professional is over.


11 posted on 04/21/2018 6:41:53 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I would have refused to comply with the judge’s order and cite attorney-client privilege as my authority for doing so. I believe that the order was ultra-vires.


16 posted on 04/21/2018 7:37:08 AM PDT by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kimba Wood needs to be removed from the bench-—permanently.


18 posted on 04/21/2018 7:45:11 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
if it wasn't for the attorney representing the press

Who has standing for what??

21 posted on 04/21/2018 9:21:30 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It's not a "newsworthy" exception, it's a "Republican" exception.

-PJ

23 posted on 04/21/2018 9:28:41 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Then by the same reasoning, journalists should not be permitted to keep secret the identity of their sources.


25 posted on 04/21/2018 12:26:51 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson