Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

I think this one was a good decision. Laws should not be ambiguous. Ambiguous laws drive me nuts.


13 posted on 04/17/2018 11:01:16 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: robroys woman

Indeed, Justice Scalia would have voted the same way.


14 posted on 04/17/2018 11:02:25 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: robroys woman

“Ambiguous laws drive me nuts.”

And make lawyers rich.


36 posted on 04/17/2018 11:40:24 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (We have to jam their)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: robroys woman
I think this one was a good decision. Laws should not be ambiguous. Ambiguous laws drive me nuts.

I agree. Haven't true conservatives & libertarians had this objection to the RICO statute for years?

Just what we need! Another ambiguous law for prosecutors to come after the unpopular with.

80 posted on 04/18/2018 11:29:23 AM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Stawp the hammering!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson