The second word is “White.” Obviously she has committed an unpardonable sin. They fired her. They have destroyed her life. She did nothing wrong, but is being treated worse than a criminal.
If the two guys had been White, none of this would have happened. She would not have been fired. There would be no race industry pimps shouting into megaphones. Al sharpton would be nowhere around. The ceo would not be making an a$$hole of himself trying to apologize.
The remaining staff is being reeducated with this lesson:
You can kick Whites out. Whites don’t riot. Whites don’t sue. Whites don’t have a race pimp who will stir up the natives and encourage them to burn your place down. Whites don’t have rights. Starbucks will not be given bad press if you $hit on White customers. In fact, $hit on them, they deserve it for being White.
If she had been Black, the only difference would be that the word “White” would NOT be in the article, anywhere, and there would be no picture.
What is the company policy? if she followed policy, she is absolutely right. Company policy cannot discriminate between White/Black. Unfortunately, suing will get her nowhere. She’s White, get it? White is $hit and has no rights.
When blacks riot, cities burn.
When whites riot, continents burn.