Why did Cohen’s lawyers say Sean was a client if they have no monetary relationship? I don’t understand that one.
That does seem a bit odd, no!? That must mean their is something in the paper trail before this 'court' that isn't so easily dismissed. As someone stated up thread, it's like the 'court' already knew this to be.
>> Why did Cohen’s lawyers say Sean was a client if they have no monetary relationship? <<
Why do lawyers sometimes bend the truth or even tell lies?
Beats me.