Conclusion for the Public:
8. The results of analysis of biomedical samples conducted by OPCW designated laboratories demonstrate the exposure of the three hospitalised individuals to this toxic chemical. 9. The results of analysis of the environmental samples conducted by OPCW designated laboratories demonstrate the presence of this toxic chemical in the samples. 10. The results of analysis by the OPCW designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people. 11. The TAV team notes that the toxic chemical was of high purity. The latter is concluded from the almost complete absence of impurities. 12. The name and structure of the identified toxic chemical are contained in the full classified report of the Secretariat, available to States Parties.
Interesting, but no where in that pdf does it state WHAT chemical they identified. Only that it confirmed the conclusion the Brits had arrived at.
Why would Lavrov state the Swiss had identified BZ if he couldn’t produce proof? Any reliable media company would go to the Swiss to confirm that, wouldn’t they? Well...maybe not these days.
Still makes no sense to me.