Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

why in the name of Randolph Scott would the WH telegraph this ?


2 posted on 04/12/2018 3:26:48 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

It’s cnn, more then likely they just made it up.


4 posted on 04/12/2018 3:28:59 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a

Trump’s 3-D chess.


5 posted on 04/12/2018 3:29:14 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Churchill: Success is not final, failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a

Anonymous sources are referenced.

Nobody knows who they are.

From the article.

“The talking points are still in their preliminary form, and not yet finalized, people familiar with their preparation said. The White House and the Justice Department declined to comment.”


45 posted on 04/12/2018 3:57:35 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
“why in the name of Randolph Scott would the WH telegraph this ?”

I'm sure they didn't (unless leaked). This was suggested by Alan Dershowitz recently, because Rosenstein is conflicted. He's a witness for the defense, and therefore can't ethically be part of the prosecution. You're hearing this breathlessly from CNN because the left knows this is a very legitimate and justified way to get rid of Rosenstein from the investigation, and they're afraid that this will derail Mueller.

84 posted on 04/12/2018 5:13:27 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
"....The White House is preparing talking points designed to undermine Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's credibility, according to sources familiar with the plan...."

First thing you do on thread is see what the source is. In this case it's CNN. Not credible at all. Strike 1.

Next thing is to read the article for the named sources for the story. In this case, there are none. Just the nebulous, "sources familiar with the plan." Strike 2.

And finally, asked the question, what would be reasonable to believe here? That the WH leaked the plan or that someone made this up at CNN and ran the fake news as a breaking story?

In this last case, a reasonable man would say, "Why in the name of Randolph Scott would the WH telegraph this?" Strike 3.

The story is not believable given who the news organization is, the lack of named sources, and it is just not reasonable to expect that the White House to release this to the media.

85 posted on 04/12/2018 5:24:32 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
why in the name of Randolph Scott would the WH telegraph this ?

they aren't. Traitors are literally crawling all over this administration.

93 posted on 04/12/2018 7:30:55 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
why in the name of Randolph Scott would the WH telegraph this ?

_______________________

It's CNN.

100 posted on 04/13/2018 1:45:36 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson