I see no constitutional grounds or authority for Congress to subpoena and question Zuck about his private enterprise. NONE of the feds freaking business.
A lot of people around here think Zuck is a threat. They’re missing the 800 lb gorilla in the room - the mostly unconstitutional $4 trillion government who ignores constitutional limitations, and thus, and threatens our lives and freedoms.
How about if he is actively colluding with the government to censor you, shape your view of reality, and keep you from understanding what is being done, by repeatedly lying to you?
It is very close to bribing congressmen to pass the laws you wish. Do you find any Constitutional grounds to prohibit that?
If not, why not?
They didn’t subpoena him and he wasn’t under oath. If he didn’t want to speak to Congressional committees he didn’t have to go.
Zuck and the NSA are true lovers—cannot be separated as long as they both shall live.