Replies

The New York Times leak was specifically structured around the CIA “electronic communication”. However, the story within the origination document is abject nonsense. ♦If Papadopoulos having a conversation in a London bar in May 2016 was the origination of the FBI counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign. Then why did the FBI wait until January 15th 2017 to talk to Papadopoulos for the first time? ♦Further, if a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why was the FBI denied a FISA application in June/July 2016? The far more realistic review says George Papadopoulos talking in May 2016, is likely about this open and public information from April 2016 about Guccifer hacking Hillary Clinton email [LINK]. The intelligence community “EC” was an excuse to start an FBI counterintelligence operation against the candidacy of Donald Trump. The true intent of the counterintel-op was to provide a cover-story for the DOJand FBI “small group” political opposition research and surveillance that was already ongoing. We’ve previously debunked this Origination Story HERE https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/11/access-granted-doj-gives-devin-nunes-trey-gowdy-and-hpsci-leadership-access-to-intelligence-origination-documents/

Thanks! I was looking at CTH briefly today and did notice that they had looked into this theory and discarded the whole Papa. story as a valid excuse but didn’t know the details.

I just hope we get this sorted out ASAP so we have a chance to survive the midterms.