That’s a fair criticism.
However, when one examine all the players who had motive for the attack, Russia and Syria are near the bottom of the list.
That said, I DO believe that if they thought it was in their interests to undertake such an attack, if it would benefit them, they would have no compunction whatsoever to kill innocents. With gas or anything else.
I am not naive.
Interestingly, the Russian Air Force could have killed more, and decisively cleared the town via conventional means. And without the headache. A single Tupolev could have done that.
But from the understandingly limited statement President Trump made today, it doesn't seem possible to acquire all the information and proof that would satisfy all because there is no access - but it seems he still feels compelled to act.
Thanks.
Did you see post 26?
#47. Russian bombers are big and can be spotted/photographed or Iphoned from the ground and sent out to the world.
Smaller fighter planes or helicopters are the best way to deliver rockets and Fuel Bombs and toxic gas.
Could have been the Syrian Army, the Russians (who don’t give a shit what the world thinks), Al Qaeda’s own supplies, ISIS supplies, etc.
Everyone of these have something to gain from killing rebels and their families, including other rebels, so it’s a crap shoot right now as to who did it.