Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpeedyInTexas

I’m no trade expert, but...

Why don’t we determine exactly what needs to be done, including tariffs, to make the trade situation right - and do it the first time?

Seems that tit-for-tat might not be the best way to go.


7 posted on 04/05/2018 4:15:45 PM PDT by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paulie

Actually, Trump did that. He asked President Xi for a plan to reduce the trade deficit by $100 billion per year. Xi ignored him.


8 posted on 04/05/2018 4:18:24 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Paulie; SpeedyInTexas

“Seems that tit-for-tat might not be the best way to go.”

Tit-for-tat forces China to reply in moderation :-) ... they can’t ignore the tariffs :-).

If you’d go all in from the start, you risk a massive shock to the financial system. Look at how markets responded to a rather low tariff ... they went haywire, but they’re recovering.

The way it’s being handled now, it’s more like a negotiation where we respond to the Chinese response. They aren’t going to risk more than they can afford. Neither are we. The Chinese are many things, but they aren’t exactly irrational ... they’re very calculated.

That’s the way I see it anyway ... you plan your moves in advance and slowly raise the stakes in response to what happens. Unless China reacts irrationally, both sides will strike a balance that will benefit the USA w/o causing major problems with China.


16 posted on 04/05/2018 4:27:12 PM PDT by edh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Paulie
Why don’t we determine exactly what needs to be done, including tariffs, to make the trade situation right - and do it the first time?

Because we don't know what China will to in retaliation.

18 posted on 04/05/2018 4:28:06 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Paulie

It had to be tit for tat. Trump didn’t plan on Chinese retaliatory measures. You can’t really plan on what the other side’s going to do Back before they do it. You give them a chance first. But once they do it, then you act. Totally unlike prior presidents! This guy is no wimp!


22 posted on 04/05/2018 4:33:32 PM PDT by CottonBall (Thank you , Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Paulie
Seems that tit-for-tat might not be the best way to go.

Basic art of the deal 101. Each time they deny your first offer, you come back even harder. I guess they didn't read his book.

33 posted on 04/05/2018 4:53:21 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson