“Article 1, Section 10, last clause, states, “[n]o state shall... keep troops... or engage in war, unless actually invaded...” demonstrating very clearly that the states retain the right and ability to call forth their militias to repel invasions. And any state government that refuses to act on the invasion over our/their borders should be impeached and removed. And the federal troops should be sent in.”
***maybe good opportunity for states to impeach/remove Brown or other state leaders along the border that sit on their hands and does not act to protect its border and citizens, or worse enables this invasion.
“maybe good opportunity for states to impeach/remove Brown or other state leaders along the border that sit on their hands and does not act to protect its border and citizens, or worse enables this invasion.”
In my opinion, they already have. Being a long time resident, I was aware of the “do nothing” attitude of the state concerning the “invasion” of illegals that has been highly active since my birth in the early 50’s. I spent the first 10 years of my life on a ranch in the central valley that required picking of fruit and had witnessed first hand the huge percentage of workers that could have easily been illegal and some that openly admitted it (if you speak enough Mexican or have one that was willing to translate). So that bridge has already been crossed and not only is nothing being done about it, but they are protecting them. For reasons of insanity, the California voters seem to love the problems attached to this and continue to vote in these liberal morons.
And with such a large contingency of illegals and their relatives that are voting, they are a shoe in for continued success. Getting these people in for a voting base is the reason they are allowed to stay. If they couldn’t vote, they’d be running them out so fast all the oxygen would be in TJ from the speed of leaving. It jut hasn’t cost the powers enough yet to put the fear of God into them.
rwood