>>Sessions’ letter says that Huber is conducting a review. He hasn’t been assigned to prosecute.<<
I’m not going to bother to quote his letter, but I think if you actually read it you’ll find that Huber was assigned to investigate, not just “conduct a review” and as a prosecutor he has the power to indict.
Im not going to bother to quote his letter, but I think if you actually read it youll find that Huber was assigned to investigate, not just conduct a review and as a prosecutor he has the power to indict.
Nothing in your response contradicts what I said. Sessions in the letter doesn't assign a prosecution task.
I actually read the letter. Did you?