Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt
We don't need a new special counsel right now; what we need is to limit the investigations:

1. To allegations of a specific crime.
2. To limit the investigation to that specific crime
3. To impose a time limit on the investigation.
6 posted on 03/30/2018 9:22:01 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

#5. Time’s Up. Mueller either craps or gets off the pot.

After 14 months of Nothingburgers, Mueller is a failure but still a Clintonista political hack.

Stop his investigation right now. Fire him. Take away his security clearance. Fire Rosenstine too on the grounds that he was interfering with the investigations and obstructing them too.

If you are going to “drain the swamp”, you don’t start with the frogs. You start with the gators.


75 posted on 03/31/2018 12:04:50 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle

“We don’t need a new special counsel right now; what we need is to limit the investigations:”

We don’t need...

Then why are the Republicans who have the evidence laid out across their desk furious with Sessions for not appointing a special counsel?

Some of the people on this site who are apparently prepared to die for Sessions’ dereliction of duty should carry their asses up to Capitol Hill and submit their superior evidence to Jim Jordan, to comfort him. Then they can drop by the Oval Office and do the same thing for Trump.

Rosentein appointed a Mueller to go after Trump with absolutely no evidence, and Sessions routinely praises the Mueller and his investigation.

The EVIDENCE of Justice Department corruption mounts up to the ceiling and Sessions can’t see the need for a special counsel?

The fact that FISA warrants were issued based on DNC produced lies, all by itself, would justify a special prosecutor.

And I still can’t believe that everyone relegates that stupendous chicanery to just a mere factoid in all the associated events, and that merely noting that it occurred satisfies the requirement for action.


120 posted on 03/31/2018 6:55:10 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson