“They’ve said any attempt to stop Mueller is impeachable”
In reality that is bull$#%t.
In reality that is bull$#%t
=========================================
Which goes to show, what mueller is doing is purely political and not based on law.
Shouldn’t we know the names that signed the warrant? Government officials plus judge?
We should keep lists.
Shouldn’t we know the names that signed the warrant? Government officials plus judge?
We should keep lists.
> “They’ve said any attempt to stop Mueller is impeachable”
> In reality that is bull$#%t.
In reality, the house can impeach for whatever reason they want.
And if they were to be talking about how the investigation should be limited to collusion and directly related issues, then Mueller would have one expectation of authority. And he’d know that 2 branches of government think his scope is limited.
But when they say it’s impeachable to remove Mueller for any reason he no doubt thinks his scope is limitless or at least has a far off boundary he’s willing to find. And that allows him to intimidate Trump supporters and associates.
He may be able to literally stop someone he doesn’t like from taking a job at the WH. If they talked to a Russian 5 years ago Mueller can cost them $100,000’s to defend their claim that the meeting was legal. And he’s going to do everything he can to find a past Russian connection and at least cost them time if not $$$ for legal defense. And congress will support him (or at least has so far) Until they start saying otherwise, they have given him authority to harass Trump associates for ANY reason he wants.