Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

During Trump’s explanation he noted the funding of missile defense systems. That is critical when you realize that in less than 60 days, Trump will go into negotiations with NoKo and Iran and did not want to do that with a depleted military.

The house vote on this bill is perplexing. Dems on both sides, yea & nay. Some state R delegations voted 100% for it (KS) and others (UT) voted 100% against it. The squishy middle of both parties voted for it. I guess that makes it Bi-Partisan?

Recent Presidential vetoes of budgets seems rare. I am looking into POTUS vetoes and do not see a budget veto since 1995 by Clinton (was it after Dems lost the house?) This “Omnibus” was thrown in front of Trump on the day before a government shut down, BY LEADERS IN HIS OWN PARTY. Signed with a gun to the head, so to speak. Trump administrations certainly has a lot on its plate...I guess Trump is supposed to manage the Congress too?

Trump definitely had the can’t you people handle anything look upon his face.


113 posted on 03/23/2018 12:00:58 PM PDT by GeaugaRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeaugaRepublican

That was my read on it too. He was willing to punt it all in order to get that military funding because something major is going down in the next few months.

If it doesn’t he is SCROOOOOOOOD.


117 posted on 03/23/2018 12:02:58 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: GeaugaRepublican

In perspective I don’t like the direction Trump seems to be going. But I will hold off on going all Pollyana on him.


202 posted on 03/23/2018 1:53:08 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson