Human fetus at 15 weeks.
Posted on 03/21/2018 7:11:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Pay attention to their actions, not what they say.
A judge has blocked Mississippi's new law banning abortions after 15 weeks, and supporters of abortion say it is obviously unconstitutional.
But of course, cities and states can blatantly ignore federal immigration law if they want, according to progressives, for whom abortion is a sacred right.
The law bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, down from a 20-week restriction already on Mississippi's books.
The measure took effect immediately. It featured some exceptions, including if a woman's life or a "major bodily function" is threatened or if the fetus has a health problem that would mean it likely wouldn't survive outside the womb.
It doesn't include an exception in cases of rape of [sic] incest.
"As I have repeatedly said, I want Mississippi to be the safest place in America for an unborn child," Bryant said earlier this month.
Abortion-rights activists called the law unconstitutional because it limits abortions before fetuses can survive outside the womb.
Human fetus at 15 weeks.
Most abortion rights activists also support partial-birth abortion, so they really don't care if the baby is viable or not.
All lives have never mattered to the media and other Democrats. They only pretend to care.
They say women have a choice to do whatever they want with their bodies, but then, under Obamacare, they do not give women the choice as to what kind of health insurance to buy and what coverage they need. The women don't have the brains to make that choice, according to Obamacare-supporters.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’ll be honest. Not having an exception for rape or incest troubles me.
scroll down to women that abort and why.
I have been disgusted for years over most of the rationales used to justify abortions. However, I do think some changes need to be changed such as:
1. Make sure the male responsible for the sperm creating the soon to be aborted fetus signs the abortion papers.
2. Make it clear the DNA of the child will be recovered and analyzed to make sure when another DNA from anywhere or any reason comes up matching the child’s to the extent the paternal DNA ever does, then arrest the b......d. The arrest warrent should be clear the fetus was not read it rights to survive. I think that is murder.
I do understand the need to terminate a pregnancy if the fetus is horribly genetically malformed. It is a horrible legacy for a woman to bear an anencephalic child, for example. Situations like those may be medically necessary. But, for my purposes here, a normal, healthy fetus should not be aborted. And all women who bear the responsibility of such a procedure should share it equally with the genetic father and the pair should be responsible for the child until it is 18 or finished with college.
Just an aside, perhaps male contraceptives will be more interesting to develop if responsibility for creating a life is shared?
I understand that it is a tiny minority of women who abort because of rape and incest, but as the Father of a Daughter, I can understand why she would want that as an option, were she raped.
They want more and more abortions to please the raging man-hating feminazis who practice abortion as their sacrament. Every time they kill a baby they affirm their rejection of human nature and its Author.
Black Unborn Lives Matter
PLUS ... I don't think there are that many unprotected girls raped.
I believe that as well. I just struggle with it. Same with life of the Mother exemptions.
“1. Make sure the male responsible for the sperm creating the soon to be aborted fetus signs the abortion papers.”
Sorry to disagree.
Isn’t that what MARRIAGE is for? To make a man legally responsible for the progeny of the union.
You want kids, get married and carry on like two healthy rabbits. Don’t attempt to control a woman like a caveman.
period.
It doesn't matter what motivates that thought into action ... it just is.
I (the woman) don't want to.
I DON'T WANT YOU !
They should also stop pretending they want "sensible gun laws." They really want all guns banned.
Again, I consider myself Pro Life, but if my daughter were raped, I’m not sure how I would feel about the child.
Nor I
RE: Again, I consider myself Pro Life, but if my daughter were raped, I’m not sure how I would feel about the child.
Would you consider giving the child up for adoption given that there are more couples waiting to adopt than babies aborted?
See here:
http://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/waiting_adoptive_families
and here:
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/17/why-do-more-people-choose-abortion-over-adoption/
Absolutely. That would be my first choice.
I certainly agree about the marriage. However, men should not take sole responsibility for the progeny of the union. Women are fully capable of sharing that responsibility.
Abortion is another issue in that men escape scot free at this point yet they are responsible for donating at least 1/2 the DNA to the baby. I want them to be responsible for their part in the creation and everything else including abortion if that is their murderous desire.
I certainly agree about the marriage. However, men should not take sole responsibility for the progeny of the union. Women are fully capable of sharing that responsibility.
Abortion is another issue in that men escape scot free at this point yet they are responsible for donating at least 1/2 the DNA to the baby. I want them to be responsible for their part in the creation and everything else including abortion if that is their murderous desire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.