Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: logi_cal869

It doesn’t refer to Mueller.


48 posted on 03/21/2018 10:08:34 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Nifster

Did you forget your sarc tag?

Holy cow, dude. Gowdy was arguing to KEEP Mueller after Dowd called for getting rid of him, just like the entire Sara Carter article is about how he shouldn’t be there.

Did you not listen to Gowdy’s full rant?

I understand what she meant, but it’s like she cut out a paragraph. I’ve made similar fubar edits myself.

My quoted content from the article is self-explanatory: In the previous paragraph she references “many” against him and then shifts gears right into 2 members of Congress who argue to keep him without any premise in the article whatsoever.

OUT OF CONTEXT. She cut something, or omitted a transition. Been there, done that.


50 posted on 03/21/2018 2:22:36 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson