Why can’t he then “unrecuse” himself? Is a recusal permanent? Why should it be if there was skulduggery afoot? And ANYTHING close to an Obama or Clinton is nefarious as can be.
I don't think that is the right question. The answer to that question is, by the way, "yes."
Think instead about the scope of recusal. Sessions was challenged about participating in firing Comey, on the asinine basis that somehow his recusal from investigating the Trump campaign striped him of the power to manage the FBI.
Not in Sessions defense, but if the AG is the only "powerhouse" the DOJ has, capable of going after Comey, Crooked Hillary, and treason/sedition in general, we are truly screwed as a nation. Seriously, ONE MAN in THIS SPOT makes all the difference? Antithesis of "rule of law," if you ask me.