On the one hand I recall the father saying that their son told them he had hacked the DNC emails.
But on the other hand, against all evidence to the contrary that this murder was a random mugging where no valuables were taken from the victim and he was shot point blank range with two shots to the back of the head, execution-style, they do not sound like an aggrieved family.
I think the "frightened" and/or "well-paid off" are the most likely scenarios here. Being delusional democRATS would be the least likely one.
They've been told not to discuss or pursue the real reasons for their son's murder. Just like the police, whose higher ups told them not to talk about the case or they would be fired. Too much of what is known doesn't match what the poice say happened.
As in the law, what would a "reasonable man" do? Their behavior is out of sync with their words and actions.
A law suit opens the case up to “discovery “
Which opens up ALL the police records.
Smart move
I agree with your post—except that what Seth did was just steal the emails from within the building—”hacking” means that the theft was made using the Internet from a remote location. That is why the Deep State loves to use the word “hacking”—it leads you away from the real culprit in many cases—the inside job.