To: af_vet_rr
The democrats outspent the Republicans 5-1. Come now. Why if I am running the GOP would I spend money on a lackluster candidate in a SPECIAL election in a district that likely wont exist? And if it does, then there will be a do-over in 8 short months.
To: FlipWilson
Lamb giving an acceptance speech right now, and although media touted as moderate, all he’s doing is praising unions. So he is 100 percent Nancy’s.
To: FlipWilson
Keep making excuses. the left is in full hate mode and so are anti Trump republicans ..the hate POTUS and are BIG TIME motivated.
The GOP-e wants POTUS agenda to lose just as much as the left.
To: FlipWilson
>>Why if I am running the GOP would I spend money on a lackluster candidate in a SPECIAL election in a district that likely wont exist?
You'd have to ask the idiots running the show why they spent so much on a seat that's going away.
To: FlipWilson
>>The democrats outspent the Republicans 5-1.
Yes, Lamb raised $3.9 million, and spent $3.1 million
Sure, Saccone raised $600,000, spent $615,000
However, you're ignoring something very, very important.
Lamb had around $2.6 million of outside funds spent on him.
The GOP brought in and spent $10.7 million on Saccone.
The GOP cannot bring in $10 million for every one of the 100+ races that are more competitive than PA-18. Races for seats that will exist next year. Races that will decide whether the Democrats take the House.
People in the GOP should be fired for that tonight. But they won't be fired. They'll blame Saccone, Miller, the Democrats, the weather, etc.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson