“This is no different than AL, yes they won, but the next regular election, we will win it back.”
Very true, but the Dems get a narrative to attract donors. That’s why they blow a ton of money on these things. They need wins. This would be as big as AL if they win this district. If they lose, they still get to tout how they wiped out a Trump +18 advantage or some other narrative.
Bottom line is that the RNC needs to get voters to turn out. If they’re not up for it, then Trump will have to do the heavy lifting.
You can make any race close if you throw piles of money at it + get your side to turn out heavily.
The lame stream media evening news said that the dems spent three times as much money on this race for Lamb than the GOP spent on Saccone.
Meanwhile, the narrative is the GOP has all the money and the RATS have none. Sure.
Perhaps Mitt’s niece needs to be replaced as head of the RNC.