Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

The thread title and the excerpted text are the same here as it is on Breitbart.

I certainly will wait for a better source than Breitbart before getting bent out of shape about it though.


30 posted on 03/12/2018 8:04:20 PM PDT by TigersEye (13 Russian Facebook trolls ... and a Siberian partridge in a Russian Olive tree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye; Admin Moderator

No.

This exerpt says: “without court order”

The Breitbart article says: “with a judge’s approval”

That’s a court order.

And it’s not a match. It’s a deliberate alteration of the original text, forbidden by FR rules.


32 posted on 03/12/2018 8:09:12 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

The original poster’s excerpt says:
Breitbart News has a copy of the release and it urges states
to adopt Extreme Risk Protection Orders without court order.

The text at the link says:
Breitbart News has a copy of the release and it urges states
to adopt Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs).
Such orders allow firearms to be confiscated with a judge’s approval.

You can’t see the difference???


33 posted on 03/12/2018 8:10:54 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye
I certainly will wait for a better source than Breitbart

When did Breitbart become an unreliable source?

35 posted on 03/12/2018 8:13:30 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson