Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neefer

“We saw in the 1980s a shift from pensions to 401(k)s; that was a raw deal for workers. These retirement plans were marketed as an instrument of financial freedom, but they were really transferring risk from the shoulder of the employers to the backs of the workers.”

There is absolutely no reason for an employer to provide for your retirement. I’m just upset that Social Security was not voluntary, because had I been able to invest that money in a 401K I would have retired rich.
What I do object to is public employees getting fully indexed retirements with little or no personal contributions, and the ability to retire with full pensions before age 65 (here in CA cops and FFs get full retirement at age 50).


41 posted on 03/10/2018 8:08:03 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387

Oh, I hear ya. And to make it worse, the Feds cover pensions that private companies couldn’t cover via the government backed Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.


91 posted on 03/11/2018 4:23:55 AM PDT by neefer (We're walking real proud and we're talking real loud again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson