The difference is that there is no Constitutional right to buy alcohol. There is a Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
>
he difference is that there is no Constitutional right to buy alcohol. There is a Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
>
*sigh*
The Const. doesn’t GRANT Rights, but merely reaffirms a FEW of import vs. govt. The Rights of the People are INFINITE; the power of govt are few and defined.
9th A:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people
Yes there is, says “life, liberty, and
the pursuit of HAPPINESS”....just kidding.
Many a father has bonded with their sons
at very early ages. One of the best
mediums is to teach them to shoot,
and ALL respect and responsibility that
must accompany that right. This Cruz
character had no such guidance and
teachings. Not the rifles fault.
I was 7 years old when I won a BB
gun match, sponsored by the Jay-Cees.
I had a great teacher.
Nonsense. Rights don’t come from the Constitution.
If it is constitutional to impose an age limit of 18, then how can it be unconstitutional to impose an age limit of 21?
Joined the NRA recently, but this is not a winning fight.