Since Nicole is to be in guns, I don’t understand why the courts and everyone has a push them to proposing a constitutional amendment, which is the only legitimate way that they can be in guns. Let them try to get 37 states or whatever it’s required to approve a constitutional amendment change. Until then they just need to get used to the fact that some of us like to have our guns. And, some of us can afford hundreds of paid security, nor do we want to wait 8 to 10 minutes for the police to respond if we are in need of assistance.
Can an amendment revoke shall not be infringed?