Let’s not in our hate of Nancy reject the idea that more tax cuts should follow.
You hit the nail on the head.
Patriots need to get up to speed with the idea that if a given federal social spending program is not reasonably related to the US Mail Service (1.8.7) then you can bet that the program is unconstitutional and be right probably most of the time.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
Patriots would get an even bigger tax break if they supported Pres. Trump in putting a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress cannot justify under it constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers which the Supreme Court indicated in the Gibbons v. Ogden excerpt above.
Note that if the citizens of a given state want state social spending services to replace unconstitutional federal spending programs that are discontinued then state taxes must necessarily go up.
Corrections, insights welcome.