“He is two miles outside the surveillance zone, for one thing.”
According to you. Please give us the lat and long of the camera and his fenceline. Bet this is some legal sophistry. His entry gate is likely 2 miles out of the zone, but not the entire property.
And that far in, there are likely good reasons to watch his place.
I’m just going by the article. Should the feds be able to ‘watch your place’ with a camera mounted on a tree on your property against your wishes, without so much as a warrant?